EV SSL Part 2: I Told You so
PERMALINK || External link to topic of post
Well, it seems that there's really more crapola to this EV SSL abomination.
A Standford study finds EV SSL certifiably useless.
Quote:
Ouch! But really what did the CA/Browser Forum expect? If confusion wasn't the obvious answer, well, with all due respect, seems like their project was led by sales. And worse, fracturing this whole concept of trust in the "padlock" (re: what have these trusted 3rd party Certificate Authorities been doing all this time? Issuing junk?)
Can we call it just what it is? A desperate search for a new revenue stream
I truly hope this is another early nail in this abomination's coffin.
References: Standford Paper
PDF file. Tip: Parts 5.1, 5.2 (Discussion) and Part 6 (Conclusion) contain relevant findings
A Standford study finds EV SSL certifiably useless.
Quote:
"The only real information a user will get from an EV certificate is that a particular web site ponied up extra cash to get one"
Ouch! But really what did the CA/Browser Forum expect? If confusion wasn't the obvious answer, well, with all due respect, seems like their project was led by sales. And worse, fracturing this whole concept of trust in the "padlock" (re: what have these trusted 3rd party Certificate Authorities been doing all this time? Issuing junk?)
Can we call it just what it is? A desperate search for a new revenue stream
I truly hope this is another early nail in this abomination's coffin.
References: Standford Paper
PDF file. Tip: Parts 5.1, 5.2 (Discussion) and Part 6 (Conclusion) contain relevant findings


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home